Throughout the Syrian uprising, Western commentators have tended to view the country’s spiralling violence, and the gradual evisceration of the regime, as the direct result of Asad’s blunders.
The strategy of the Obama doctrine – covert by nature, engaging and collaborative in public – found its cauldron in Syria and the Arab Spring.
Now that the Muslim Brotherhood has established itself in Egyptian politics through democratic means, the West finds itself in a position where the phrase ‘be careful what you wish for’ seems entirely apt.
The people of Israel are rightly becoming increasingly anxious. What lies in store for their country is far from certain.
With a tentative ceasefire agreement that is almost certainly doomed to fail, and amid the UK’s promises to increase its material support for https://www.acheterviagrafr24.com/acheter-viagra-sans-ordonnance/ the opposition, the international community’s stance on Syria appears to be moving irrevocably beyond diplomacy.
One of the biggest concerns expressed in the West about the Arab Spring was the potential rise of hard-line Islamist governments. 2011, the year in which regime change supposedly took much of commander sildenafil 100 wiki the world by surprise, proved to be…
In February, British Foreign Secretary William Hague described the crisis in Syria as an “utterly unacceptable situation which demands a united international response”. Yet the UK and the West has adopted a disjointed and uncertain que es mejor la viagra cialis o levitra stance.